点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
2023太原古县城年货节启动：促消费、添年味******
中新网太原1月18日电 (高雨晴)1月17日晚，由山西省商务厅主办的2023太原古县城年货节启动。此次活动以旅游、娱乐、美食、购物为主线，通过现场展销、技艺展演、互动体验、文创展示、直播带货等，融合古城旅游、线上直播，实现线上线下联动促消费，进一步推动乡村e镇品牌打造，促进老字号企业创新发展和消费共振。
山西省商务厅厅长王宏晋致辞。 高雨晴 摄为了积极搭建消费促进平台，打造沉浸式、体验式、互动式消费场景，丰富节日市场供应，山西省商务厅举办“2023太原古县城年货节暨乡村e镇网红直播大赛”活动。这是贯彻落实全省加快企业复工复产统筹疫情防控工作会议和山西省委经济工作会议有关要求的具体举措。
据了解，本次活动借助太原古县城花灯会，以年货节为主题，以电商直播、老字号推广、农旅融合等为抓手，以乡村e镇区域公用品牌推广为重点。活动设置乡村e镇、“品味老字号”主题展馆。
乡村e镇网红直播大赛颁奖典礼现场。 高雨晴 摄其中，乡村e镇主题展区对全省100个乡村e镇所在县(区)的农副产品、生鲜水果、名优特产等进行广泛展示，向全省人民讲好“山西故事”，展示“山西好货”，让年味更浓。同时，为乡村e镇引流，拓展各地农产品销售渠道，提升产品知名度，促进山西产品“走出去”。
“品味老字号”主题展馆将通过开展老字号技艺展示、文化体验、网上直播带货等，促进消费者对老字号的认识和了解，提升老字号的品牌价值和影响力。参展老字号包括六味斋、荣欣堂、冠云、宁化府、老香村、永祥和、云冈、林香斋、鑫炳记、奇人傅山、堡子酒等。
图为霍州年馍 高雨晴 摄回顾过去一年，山西省商务厅厅长王宏晋说，2022年全省商务系统努力克服疫情影响，开展多渠道、多层次、多样化的“一揽子”促消费活动。包括以家电、汽车、线上线下零售为主的政府数字消费券发放工作、“品鉴山西美食·晋享山西味道”餐饮品牌推广活动。
据介绍，2022年全年发放政府数字消费券25.05亿元，带动消费268.41亿元；累计发放汽车消费券6.49亿元，拉动汽车消费160.56亿元；累计发放家电消费券4.7亿元，拉动家电消费33.8亿元。实施电商主体培育工程，推动网络零售成为消费新增长点。
游客走进乡村e镇展馆。 高雨晴 摄同时，山西打造了7个省级夜经济试点城市、18个省级夜经济生活集聚区。运城市、太原市被确定为全国“一刻钟便民生活圈”试点城市；太原市便利店发展指数位列全国第二(厦门、太原、东莞、广州、长沙)，成为我国北方唯一进入前五名的地级市。
“一系列的促消费活动，取得了显著的经济带动效果和社会效益，进一步提振了消费市场的信心，加快了服务业的复苏。”王宏晋表示，2023年，山西省商务厅将把“恢复和扩大消费”摆在优先位置，贯彻落实好国家和山西省促消费系列政策，进一步释放消费潜力，改善消费条件，创新消费场景，推动消费和商贸服务业健康发展。
图为大同阳高农副产品 高雨晴 摄本次活动由太原龙投集团和山西乐村淘网络科技有限公司承办、太原市商务局和太原市晋源区政府协办，将持续至2月14日。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)